关于ORACLE通过file_id与block_id定位数据库对象遇到的问
在ORACLE中，我们可以通过file_id（file#）与block_id（block#）去定位一个数据库对象（object）。例如，我们在10046生成的trace文件中file#=4 block#=266 blocks=8,那么我可以通过下面两个SQL去定位对象SQL 1：此SQL效率较差，执行时间较长。
SELECT OWNER,
SEGMENT_NAME,
SEGMENT_TYPE,
TABLESPACE_NAME
FROM DBA_EXTENTS
WHERE FILE_ID =&FILE_ID
AND &BLOCK_ID BETWEEN BLOCK_ID AND BLOCK_ID + BLOCKS - 1;SQL 2：此SQL效率较快（ORACLE 10g 中没有CACHEHINT字段）
SELECT OBJD,
FILE#,
BLOCK#,
CLASS#,
TS#,
CACHEHINT,
STATUS,
DIRTY
FROM V$BH
WHERE FILE# = &FILE_ID
AND BLOCK# = &BLOCK_ID;
SELECT OWNER, OBJECT_NAME FROM DBA_OBJECTS WHERE OBJECT_ID=&OBJECT_ID;下面通过一个例子来演示一下，详情如下所示
SQL> COL OWNER FOR A12;
SQL> COL SEGMENT_NAME FOR A32;
SQL> SELECT OWNER,
2 SEGMENT_NAME ,
3 HEADER_FILE ,
4 HEADER_BLOCK
5 FROM DBA_SEGMENTS
6 WHERE OWNER='TEST' AND SEGMENT_NAME='EMPLOYEE';
OWNERSEGMENT_NAME HEADER_FILE HEADER_BLOCK
------------ -------------------------------- ----------- ------------
TEST EMPLOYEE 4 266
SQL>
SQL> SELECT OWNER,
2 SEGMENT_NAME,
3 SEGMENT_TYPE,
4 TABLESPACE_NAME
5 FROM DBA_EXTENTS
6 WHERE FILE_ID = 4
7 AND 266 BETWEEN BLOCK_ID AND BLOCK_ID + BLOCKS - 1;
OWNERSEGMENT_NAME SEGMENT_TYPETABLESPACE_NAME
------------ -------------------------------- ------------------ -----------------
TEST EMPLOYEE TABLE USERS
SQL>
SQL> SELECT OBJD,
2 FILE#,
3 BLOCK#,
4 CLASS#,
5 TS#,
6 CACHEHINT,
7 STATUS,
8 DIRTY
9 FROM V$BH
10 WHERE FILE# = 4
11 AND BLOCK# = 266;
OBJDFILE#BLOCK#CLASS#TS# CACHEHINT STATUSD
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -
76090 4266 4 4 15 cr N
76090 4266 4 4 15 cr N
76090 4266 4 4 15 cr N
SQL> SELECT OWNER, OBJECT_NAME FROM DBA_OBJECTS WHERE OBJECT_ID=76090;
OWNEROBJECT_NAME
------------ ------------------------------------------------------------
TEST EMPLOYEE
clip_image001
昨天在群里讨论一个关于空闲块的问题时，我验证测试时，发现一个奇怪的现象，使用下面SQL找到了一个最大空闲块。
SELECT UPPER(F.TABLESPACE_NAME) AS "表空间名",
D.TOT_GROOTTE_MB AS "表空间大小(M)",
D.TOT_GROOTTE_MB - F.TOTAL_BYTES AS "已使用空间(M)",
TO_CHAR(ROUND((D.TOT_GROOTTE_MB - F.TOTAL_BYTES) / D.TOT_GROOTTE_MB * 100,2),'990.99')
AS "使用比",
F.TOTAL_BYTES AS "空闲空间(M)",
F.MAX_BYTES AS "最大空闲块(M)"
FROM
(SELECT TABLESPACE_NAME,
ROUND(SUM(BYTES) / (1024 * 1024), 2) TOTAL_BYTES,
ROUND(MAX(BYTES) / (1024 * 1024), 2) MAX_BYTES
FROM SYS.DBA_FREE_SPACE
GROUP BY TABLESPACE_NAME
) F,
(SELECT DD.TABLESPACE_NAME,
ROUND(SUM(DD.BYTES) / (1024 * 1024), 2) TOT_GROOTTE_MB
FROM SYS.DBA_DATA_FILES DD
GROUP BY DD.TABLESPACE_NAME
) D
WHERE D.TABLESPACE_NAME = F.TABLESPACE_NAME;
SELECT FILE_ID,BLOCK_ID, BYTES,BLOCKS
FROM DBA_FREE_SPACE
WHERE TABLESPACE_NAME=&TABLESPACE_NAME
ORDER BY BYTES DESC;然后我发现使用上面两个SQL查不到对应的对象。如下截图所示：
后面查了一下资料，发现在Oracle Database 10g引入了回收站功能后，会将回收站（RECYCLEBIN$）中的空间计算为自由空间，加入到dba_free_space字典中。在$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/catspace.sql中，你可以找到视图DBA_FREE_SPACE的定义，脚本如下：
ORACLE 10g中DBA_FREE_SPACE的定义：
create or replace view DBA_FREE_SPACE
(TABLESPACE_NAME, FILE_ID, BLOCK_ID,
BYTES, BLOCKS, RELATIVE_FNO)
as
select ts.name, fi.file#, f.block#,
f.length * ts.blocksize, f.length, f.file#
from sys.ts$ ts, sys.fet$ f, sys.file$ fi
where ts.ts# = f.ts#
and f.ts# = fi.ts#
and f.file# = fi.relfile#
and ts.bitmapped = 0
union all
select /*+ ordered use_nl(f) use_nl(fi) */
ts.name, fi.file#, f.ktfbfebno,
f.ktfbfeblks * ts.blocksize, f.ktfbfeblks, f.ktfbfefno
from sys.ts$ ts, sys.x$ktfbfe f, sys.file$ fi
where ts.ts# = f.ktfbfetsn
and f.ktfbfetsn = fi.ts#
and f.ktfbfefno = fi.relfile#
and ts.bitmapped <> 0 and ts.online$ in (1,4) and ts.contents$ = 0
union all
select /*+ ordered use_nl(u) use_nl(fi) */
ts.name, fi.file#, u.ktfbuebno,
u.ktfbueblks * ts.blocksize, u.ktfbueblks, u.ktfbuefno
from sys.recyclebin$ rb, sys.ts$ ts, sys.x$ktfbue u, sys.file$ fi
where ts.ts# = rb.ts#
and rb.ts# = fi.ts#
and u.ktfbuefno = fi.relfile#
and u.ktfbuesegtsn = rb.ts#
and u.ktfbuesegfno = rb.file#
and u.ktfbuesegbno = rb.block#
and ts.bitmapped <> 0 and ts.online$ in (1,4) and ts.contents$ = 0
union all
select ts.name, fi.file#, u.block#,
u.length * ts.blocksize, u.length, u.file#
from sys.ts$ ts, sys.uet$ u, sys.file$ fi, sys.recyclebin$ rb
where ts.ts# = u.ts#
and u.ts# = fi.ts#
and u.segfile# = fi.relfile#
and u.ts# = rb.ts#
and u.segfile# = rb.file#
and u.segblock# = rb.block#
and ts.bitmapped = 0
/
ORACLE 11g中DBA_FREE_SPACE的定义：
create or replace view DBA_FREE_SPACE
(TABLESPACE_NAME, FILE_ID, BLOCK_ID,
BYTES, BLOCKS, RELATIVE_FNO)
as
select ts.name, fi.file#, f.block#,
f.length * ts.blocksize, f.length, f.file#
from sys.ts$ ts, sys.fet$ f, sys.file$ fi
where ts.ts# = f.ts#
and f.ts# = fi.ts#
and f.file# = fi.relfile#
and ts.bitmapped = 0
union all
select /*+ ordered use_nl(f) use_nl(fi) */
ts.name, fi.file#, f.ktfbfebno,
f.ktfbfeblks * ts.blocksize, f.ktfbfeblks, f.ktfbfefno
from sys.ts$ ts, sys.x$ktfbfe f, sys.file$ fi
where ts.ts# = f.ktfbfetsn
and f.ktfbfetsn = fi.ts#
and f.ktfbfefno = fi.relfile#
and ts.bitmapped <> 0 and ts.online$ in (1,4) and ts.contents$ = 0
union all
select /*+ ordered use_nl(u) use_nl(fi) */
ts.name, fi.file#, u.ktfbuebno,
u.ktfbueblks * ts.blocksize, u.ktfbueblks, u.ktfbuefno
from sys.recyclebin$ rb, sys.ts$ ts, sys.x$ktfbue u, sys.file$ fi
where ts.ts# = rb.ts#
and rb.ts# = fi.ts#
and u.ktfbuefno = fi.relfile#
and u.ktfbuesegtsn = rb.ts#
and u.ktfbuesegfno = rb.file#
and u.ktfbuesegbno = rb.block#
and ts.bitmapped <> 0 and ts.online$ in (1,4) and ts.contents$ = 0
union all
select ts.name, fi.file#, u.block#,
u.length * ts.blocksize, u.length, u.file#
from sys.ts$ ts, sys.uet$ u, sys.file$ fi, sys.recyclebin$ rb
where ts.ts# = u.ts#
and u.ts# = fi.ts#
and u.segfile# = fi.relfile#
and u.ts# = rb.ts#
and u.segfile# = rb.file#
and u.segblock# = rb.block#
and ts.bitmapped = 0
/那么在DBA_FREE_SPACE中找到的最大空闲块是否很有可能就是回收站中曾经的一个对象呢？那么我们来测试看看。
SQL> show parameter recyclebin;
NAME TYPEVALUE
------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
recyclebin stringon
SQL> CREATE TABLE ESCMOWNER.TTT
2 AS
3 SELECT * FROM DBA_OBJECTS;
Table created.
SQL> COL OWNER FOR A12;
SQL> COL SEGMENT_NAME FOR A32;
SQL> SELECT OWNER,SEGMENT_NAME, HEADER_FILE, HEADER_BLOCK
2 FROM DBA_SEGMENTS
3 WHERE OWNER='ESCMOWNER' AND SEGMENT_NAME='TTT' ;
OWNERSEGMENT_NAME HEADER_FILE HEADER_BLOCK
------------ -------------------------------- ----------- ------------
ESCMOWNER TTT 97113025
SQL>
SQL> SELECT * FROM X$KTFBFE WHERE KTFBFEFNO=97;
ADDR INDX INST_ID KTFBFETSN KTFBFEFNO KTFBFEBNO KTFBFEBLKS
---------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
00007F57B2388CA0222 1 9 97524169120
SQL> DROP TABLE ESCMOWNER.TTT;
Table dropped.
SQL> COL ORIGINAL_NAME FOR A16;
SQL> SELECT OBJ#,OWNER#,ORIGINAL_NAME,FILE#,BLOCK# ,FLAGS,SPACE FROM RECYCLEBIN$;
OBJ#OWNER# ORIGINAL_NAME FILE#BLOCK#FLAGSSPACE
---------- ---------- ---------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
805429 73 TTT 97113025 30896
SQL> PURGE DBA_RECYCLEBIN;
DBA Recyclebin purged.
SQL> SELECT * FROM X$KTFBFE WHERE KTFBFEFNO=97 ;
ADDR INDX INST_ID KTFBFETSN KTFBFEFNO KTFBFEBNO KTFBFEBLKS
---------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
00007F57B2388CA0222 1 9 97113025 8
00007F57B2388CA0225 1 9 97524169120
SQL>
clip_image003
如上所示，清空回收站对象后，你会发现X$KTFBFE中多了一条记录，KTFBFEFNO 和 KTFBFEBNO分别为97 ，113025， 这个值显然就是删除对象TTT曾经的FILE_ID（97）和BLOCK_ID（113025）值。
另外，在测试过程中发现，并不是每次的测试结果都是在X$KTFBFE中多一条记录，有时候记录不会变化，但是X$KTFBFE中某条记录的KTFBFEBNO会变化，而这个变化跟清空回收站是有关系的。如下案例所示：
SQL> show parameter recyclebin;
NAME TYPEVALUE
------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
recyclebin stringon
SQL> CREATE TABLE TEST.TTT
2 AS
3 SELECT * FROM DBA_OBJECTS;
Table created.
SQL> COL OWNER FOR A12;
SQL> COL SEGMENT_NAME FOR A32;
SQL> SELECT OWNER,SEGMENT_NAME, HEADER_FILE, HEADER_BLOCK
2 FROM DBA_SEGMENTS
3 WHERE OWNER='TEST' AND SEGMENT_NAME='TTT' ;
OWNERSEGMENT_NAME HEADER_FILE HEADER_BLOCK
------------ -------------------------------- ----------- ------------
TEST TTT 5 130
SQL> SELECT * FROM X$KTFBFE WHERE KTFBFEFNO=5 ;
ADDR INDX INST_ID KTFBFETSN KTFBFEFNO KTFBFEBNO KTFBFEBLKS
---------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
00002BA829B19558150 1 6 51280506752
00002BA829B19558151 1 6 550803216256
SQL> DROP TABLE TEST.TTT;
Table dropped.
SQL>
SQL> COL ORIGINAL_NAME FOR A16;
SQL> SELECT OBJ#,OWNER#,ORIGINAL_NAME,FILE#,BLOCK# ,FLAGS,SPACE FROM RECYCLEBIN$;
OBJ#OWNER# ORIGINAL_NAME FILE#BLOCK#FLAGSSPACE
---------- ---------- ---------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
82820 85 TTT 5130 301152
SQL> SELECT * FROM X$KTFBFE WHERE KTFBFEFNO=5 ;
ADDR INDX INST_ID KTFBFETSN KTFBFEFNO KTFBFEBNO KTFBFEBLKS
---------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
00002BA829B159D8150 1 6 51280506752
00002BA829B159D8151 1 6 550803216256
SQL> PURGE DBA_RECYCLEBIN;
DBA Recyclebin purged.
SQL> SELECT * FROM X$KTFBFE WHERE KTFBFEFNO=5 ;
ADDR INDX INST_ID KTFBFETSN KTFBFEFNO KTFBFEBNO KTFBFEBLKS
---------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
00002BA829B159D8150 1 6 5128507904
00002BA829B159D8151 1 6 550803216256
SQL>
clip_image004
如上所示，在清空回收站的表以后，你查询X$KTFBFE，就会发现其中一条记录的KTFBFEBNO的变化了，它们的关系为
1280 -1152 = 128
所以，你会看到KTFBFEBNO的值从1280变为了128了。此时你查看DBA_FREE_SPACE，就会看到这样的情况。所以当清空回收站时，有可能是数据库将这个表的空间标记为了空闲块，也有可能是将这个空闲块合并到其它空闲块去了。
X$KTFBFE其实是这几个单词ernel ablespace ile itmapped ree xtents 的首字母。关于这个系统视图最深入的介绍，莫过于这篇文章谈谈Oracle dba_free_space，有兴趣可以验证、测试一下。
以上所述是小编给大家介绍的关于ORACLE通过file_id与block_id定位数据库对象遇到的问题引发的思考，希望对大家有所帮助，如果大家有任何疑问欢迎给我留言，小编会及时回复大家的！
https://www.uoften.com/dbs/oracle/20180415/73731.html
页:
[1]